Antivirus Performance Comparison
When choosing antivirus software, it’s important to understand the amount of your computer’s resources the program will consume. The most effective software will have minimal impact on performance of your system, while still providing excellent protection against malware and viruses.
Most antivirus software companies publish extensive tests in PDF format. The reports include at-a-glance ratings of performance, protection and usability for each suite and detailed graphs and charts illustrating the results of particular testing elements. Key figures to look out for include the proportion of real-world and reference set malware exposures that are blocked, neutralised, or compromised by the software and the percentage of false positives detected by benign software.
Avast Free Antivirus had the most impressive scores for Windows virus detection in AV-Comparatives tests that were conducted in June 2023. It also had the highest rate of success in blocking Mac malware. It also scored highly in the categories of passive, full-scan, and quick-scan.
In the category of paid programs, Bitdefender Total Security had the tiniest post-installation background system impact which was followed by Kaspersky Total Security and ESET Security Cloud Free. It was the slowest in both full-scans and quick-scans. The slight background impact could be due to the fact that it doesn’t run by default on Windows 10 and 11, as most of its rivals do.
Intego was the one with the lowest impact on system performance for background scans http://www.avastantivirusreview.com/reliable-security-top-best-free-antivirus and full scans, but it still managed to find every bit of malware. It’s rare to find a company which solely concentrates on Macs. This makes it an excellent option for any security arsenal.